From Dan Ariely’s mailbox:
I’ve gotten used to the amount of communication that occurs via text nowadays and even sometimes prefer it. However, when it comes to resolving relationship conflicts, having a face-to-face conversation still feels like the right approach to me. Would you agree with my intuition that people can better resolve their issues by putting down their devices and having an in-person chat? —Missy
So before I share Dan’s response – what do you think?
I would think that face to face is the best way to handle such conversations. I think talking face to face allows each person to get a better read on what the other person is really trying to say. I can see where texting may make it easier for someone to say something they might have trouble saying face to face, but then to me, that is a warning sign right there. If communicating is easier via text, then it would seem to suggest that the whole relationship should be via text, which would imply it’s not a real relationship.
But what do I know? Here is Dan’s response:
Having a face-to-face conversation feels like it would be the best way to resolve conflict. Intuitions, however, can misguide us, which is one reason it’s important to test our assumptions about human behavior.
In 2020, researchers explored the question of whether face-to-face or text-based communication was more effective for resolving conflict in romantic relationships. Couples came into a lab and were given the opportunity to talk about issues they had reported arguing about. Some of the couples talked about their disagreements in person, while other couples were put in separate rooms where they were only able to text each other. Once the concerns felt partially resolved, researchers asked the participants if they felt understood by their partners, how well their issues were dealt with and how distressed or angry they felt during the discussion.
Overall, there were no differences in these measures between couples in the two groups! Both modes of communication were equally effective (or ineffective). So if your way of resolving arguments isn’t working for you, you might want to look into the possible reasons for that—maybe it’s your style of communication, for example, or your relative willingness to take responsibility. But don’t be too quick to blame the method of communication.
I am surprised by the results.
Texting is fine for things like “How’s your day going?”, or “Do you need anything from the grocery store?”, or “Have you read Borden’s blog today?”
But it just doesn’t seem appropriate for resolving relationship conflicts.
If couples think they can have effective communication on such a serious topic via text, then what’s to stop the relationship from dissolving into just sending texts back and forth, if that’s what the couple feels more comfortable with?
At that point, it does not seem like much of a romantic relationship.
But what do I know? I try to resolve relationship conflicts with staring contests and thumb wrestling…
*image from WIkipedia
The Doc would fall asleep waiting for me to get everything I need to say down in a text. Either that
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oops …either that or just get tired of waiting.
LikeLiked by 2 people
good point; there is the chance that tech problems could get in the way of the texting approach 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Texting leaves a permanent record on the opposite end so be careful.
LikeLiked by 5 people
yes, those words could come back to haunt you….
LikeLike
Wrong Dan! Texting is for asking what you should pick up at McDonald’s, not solving serious relationship problems.
LikeLiked by 5 people
agreed!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Relationship issues are best dealt with face to face. Texting is too vague imo. However, I know people who use email for their conflict resolution.
LikeLiked by 2 people
email seems even stranger, because of the possible delay in response…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think the key lies in this sentence: “Once the concerns felt partially resolved, researchers asked the participants if they felt understood by their partners, how well their issues were dealt with”
So, whether by text or by face-to-face conversation, the concerns were partially resolved. So naturally, the participants from either mode of conversation are going to report similar results. This makes the entire study meaningless, in my opinion.
LikeLiked by 4 people
I had thought the same thing. It would be like comparing the effectiveness of running vs swimming for achieving your fitness goals. If you ask the swimmers and runners who achieved their goal if their sport was effective, of course they would say yes…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sometimes the written word facilitates more thoughtful words, leaves less room for misinterpretation, slows down the communication. I have used both.
LikeLiked by 6 people
You do have a point there. Writing in a card or writing a letter can be a way to think through things more , but I still would say not by text when something serious. If its too long it can get broken up when you send it and be confusing to the recipient.
LikeLiked by 2 people
A text is is too difficult to pull off but I am guilty of emailing on sensitive subjects. It keeps me from interrupting!
LikeLiked by 1 person
from the comments I am reading, it seems like a combination of both writing and face to face communication is the best way to go…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Email works too 🙂 and not interrupting is always a good thing. I tend to want to finish my husband’s sentences, I know what he is going to say. LOL!
LikeLiked by 1 person
there are some advantages to being able to take your time and say what you mean, and sometimes the written word may help with that…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Plus when you write it out you don’t have to worry about getting choked up, like you do if talking.
LikeLiked by 1 person
but I might get tears all over whatever I am writing on… 🙂
LikeLike
Haha!
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes, technology can get in the way if you try to use texting…
LikeLiked by 1 person
that makes sense; but I think it would be tough to just use texting, whereas I think you could use just face to face.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I text a lot! BUT not about serious relationship matters. I think face to face is the best way for that or by a letter or card. I do find it easier to express my feelings in writing so I have done that already.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I agree that writing does give you a chance to more clearly express your thoughts…
LikeLike
Baloney! 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
My response may not be very scientific. It is how I feel about the conclusion of the study.
LikeLiked by 1 person
at least you are not on the fence!
LikeLike
Nope! When we text, we can’t read body language, facial expressions (emojis don’t count), and saying I’m sorry in person is going to have more of an impact because it requires putting yourself out and letting your guard down. Texting is great for many situations, but not for dealing with relationship conflicts. No emotion and very little effort are required.
LikeLiked by 4 people
well said, Pete, and I agree with you that all those intangibles you mention, such as body language and facial expressions, are a key part of communication…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m a big believer in solving things face to face but I guess it would depend on the situation.
LikeLiked by 2 people
if the coflict is McDonalds vs Burger King for dinner, texting seems fine; if it is whether a couple should ever see each other again, I think face to face…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly, if it’s something small I get texting but if it’s a breakup or if something huge is going on I would definitely want to meet in person.
LikeLiked by 1 person
but I could see how some people would want to avoid being face to face if it was a breakup…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah I’ve broken up on the phone not going to lie but only for relationships that weren’t serious.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess sometimes it’s just an easier ay to get it over with….
LikeLiked by 1 person
I believe that a healthy relationship would greatly benefit from open and honest communication face-to-face. As Pete said, the ability to incorporate body language, tone, and facial expression can help a listener to discern the emotions and intent behind the words. That being said, in a situation where face-to-face communication results in escalation to an argument, then a written letter can help by removing exactly those things. The reader is left with nothing but the carefully chosen words of the writer. They can be upset by the words chosen, but now by how they were said. Of course, if you are trying to heal a romantic relationship with someone you love, wouldn’t you try everything?
LikeLiked by 4 people
what a great way to explain it Brad. the written word has its place, and can be used in combination with face to face communication. And you are right, you would try anything if you are trying to save a relationship…
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you sent a very well thought out text the words are preserved not lost the moment they are spoken or talked over, but perhaps lead to face to face later on. ‘ Sorry I rushed out this morning, got rubbish stuff to sort out at work, but booked dinner tonight at that new restaurant so we can get down to talking about ….
LikeLiked by 3 people
that seems like a perfect way to use texting. thanks for sharing…
LikeLiked by 1 person
At least three-quarters of our communication is non-verbal. I don’t feel you can communicate well via tech/text, no matter how many emojis there are. I agree with you, Jim. Face-to-face or over the phone. Hugs to you all.
LikeLiked by 3 people
thanks, Jane. seems like a problem for you and your husband to address from your different points of view!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Depends what you’re texting. “Sorry” might be a good introduction to soften up the person you want to discuss the issue with. On the whole though the problem with text (and emails, and online comments) is that they can often come across in a different spirit than the writer intended. Or just be read in a different spirit than the writer intended. Like conversing, reception depends on the recipient as much as the initiator.
One advantage might be that you have the chance to delete or amend text before you send it.
Once the words are said, they are never forgotten.
just a thought
LikeLiked by 2 people
thanks for your thoughtful response, Cahty. It seems that most people are in favor of a combination of both, for the reasons you suggest…
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Partially resolved” doesn’t mean a darn thing. If you’re running a race, do they declare a winner at the midpoint? (Not that I’m comparing relationship conflicts to issues that would have winners and losers.) So much can happen from the “partially resolved” point forward. The study is pointless.
It does make me wonder what the conflict was. Was it something embarrassing that was easier to talk about via text than face to face? Was it something one party didn’t want a written record of that would come back to be a problem later? The nature of the conflict also puts the study in question.
If you’re in a committed relationship, you should be discussing issues in person.
LikeLiked by 3 people
lots of great questions, Staci. and I agree partially resolved isn’t the end goal. I also agree it depends on what the nature of the conflict is; some simple ones could perhaps be resolved via texting…
LikeLiked by 1 person
not sure texting is the best, especially with my giant thumbs, lots of room for error
LikeLiked by 2 people
there may be lots of errors with my big mouth 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m surprised at this too. If you can’t resolve a difference by talking to each other then in my view you don’t have a relationship worthy of the name. Texts are throwaway messages, not for important things. At least send a fax instead of a text, as Phil Collins did to his about to be ex-wife 😊
LikeLiked by 3 people
I agree, Clive. For imposrtant discussions, face to face is the best. I have not heard about that Phil Collins story – I may have to investigate that a bit… 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was a rumour about the end of his second marriage. He denied it, but mud sticks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
those guys always deny…
LikeLiked by 1 person
There was definitely something in the air that night…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess he just didn’t care anymore…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe he wanted to find an easy lover…
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t know…texting is a form of communication and communication is good. If you can get your message across to the other person, if your text message is meaningful, and if there is an intent to get your feeling and message across in a way that will solve the conflict, what difference does it make if the message was sent in the mail, with a pigeon, or via text? Whatever works. If on the other hand, the text message is a cop-out, that’s a different story.
LikeLiked by 2 people
that’s a good perspective. I can see the written word being useful in certain situations, but if that is how all conflicts are resolved, it would seem to be a relationship that needs some work…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sometimes in a spat Susan and I will sit next to each other on the couch and email each other. Personally I struggle with verbal conversations and say what I mean much more clearly in writing.
LikeLiked by 3 people
it sounds like you have found a way to communicate that works; I guess at the end of the day that’s what matters…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Killer last line, Jim. It’s what we do in Govanhill all the time. Cheers kiddo!
LikeLiked by 2 people
soundsl ike I’d fit right in at Govanhill! cheers…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I disagree. Face to face has to be better. Eye contact and body language is so important and you can’t get that from a text no matter how many emojis you use! 😊😀😎😇
LikeLiked by 2 people
intuitivel, face to face would seem to be more effective. and I think I get what your emojis are trying to say 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
As Hamlet said…To text, or not to text, that is the question.
LikeLiked by 2 people
that Shakespeare guy was ahead of his time 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, his Globe Theatre was a real global internet hotspot.
LikeLiked by 1 person
👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
🎭
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fascinating to read the comments as well as your article, Jim. Of course, there is no substitute for face-to-face communication. But take away the close proximity and some people are less inhibited. Personally, I wonder how historians of the future are going to cope without letters, postcards and diaries. Somehow, they will need to tap into the digital record…
LikeLiked by 2 people
good point about the historians; I guess they will be looking at emails, text messages, and tweets!
LikeLike
While face-to-face is generally best, it also depends on the people involved. You can’t take back words, once they’re spoken. I can see where a text might be better in some situations.
LikeLiked by 2 people
great point, Jennie. so perhaps it’s a combination of both…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think so.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Texting is not for relationship talk. Sad for those who do. Texting is good for letting someone know directions or meeting up or a short note. It shouldn’t be replacing human interaction.
LikeLiked by 2 people
well said, Debby!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Our culture continues to boil our communication down into smaller and smaller pieces. Back in the dark ages, people were dedicated letter writers. Then modern technology introduced email (sorry mail carriers). Today’s world continues this downward spiral with shorter texts. We have become accustomed to a more abbreviated style of communication.
LikeLiked by 2 people
ws (well said) 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m a notorious angry emailer.. I express myself better through words… In person I get very heated and agitated very easily and quickly… Although, after I write said email, I do like to debrief lol so I guess I like both modes of communication. For big issue arguments I prefer to write first then debrief in person… For smaller arguments that I know can easily be resolved if we just take turns listening them I’m happy to have a conversation about it…
Super interesting study! 👌
LikeLiked by 2 people
it seems like you have found a way that works for you, which I think is the most important thing. and I agree that a combo of text and face to face could be the best approach…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nothing beats face to face. Especially when all the nuances really count. Great writing. I enjoyed reading.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m with you in that face to face has certain advantages. I’m glad you enjoyed the info…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good
LikeLiked by 2 people
I used to tell my ex that as long as we could talk we’d be OK. By the time our marriage ended, we really couldn’t even text. I’m still trying to decide if it’s worth it to me to continue communication with him in any way shape or form! Since as far as I know he’s still an alcoholic, and probably still a “practicing” one as well, I don’t think it would be given my opinion that this condition is what lead to the divorce.
LikeLiked by 2 people
that’s a shame; alcoholism can cause so many problems not just for the person, but those close to them as well…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Contentment is another problem
LikeLiked by 1 person