It’s a clever term in the world of consumer packaging – shrinkflation.
The term refers to downsizing a product while keeping its price the same.
When companies are struggling to maintain profits, there are three basic responses: raise the price directly, take a little bit out of the product, or reformulate the product with cheaper ingredients.
Many consumers are price-conscious, and keep a close eye on price increases. Companies would prefer not to change the ingredients of a product for fear of creating a less popular product. So that leaves shrinkflation as perhaps the most popular choice.
This is not a new tactic, but we may be experiencing more of it these days as a result of rising costs and inventory shortages.
Quartz put together this helpful image that shows four recent examples of shrinkflation:
In terms of price increases, these amount to the following:
- Bounty: 12%
- Crest: 8%
- Doritos: 5%
- Wheat Thins: 14%
Other examples of shrinkflation include
- Gatorade redesigned its 32-ounce bottle to a 28-ounce bottle, which reflects a 14% price increase
- Keebler Cookies. Chips Deluxe with M&Ms package has gone down to 9.75 from a previous 11.3 ounce per package, a 16% price increase.
- Procter &Gamble’s Charmin’s ultra soft toilet paper 18-count mega package now contains 244 two-ply sheets, down from a previous 264 double-ply sheets per roll, equivalent to an 8% price increase
- Coke has gone from 330 milliliters to 320, a price increase of 3%
I don’t have a problem with shrinkflation, as long as companies are upfront about what they are doing.
But here’s what a representative from Gatorade had to say about the reduction in bottle size:
““Basically we redesigned the bottle, it’s more aerodynamic and it’s easier to grab. The redesign generates a new cost and the bottles are a little bit more expensive…this is only a matter of design.”
And here is what Procter&Gamble said about reductions in the number of sheets in their toilet paper::
“There is a cost element to innovation — adjusting the count per pack or the package size is one way of reinvesting in this innovation while maintaining a competitive price point.”
Those explanations seem to be a bit of doubletalk or outright deception.
The Quartz article notes that such deception can be costly:
Selling less of a product in the same packaging, or not communicating changes can lead to business disasters. In 2021, McCormick ended up paying $2.5 million to resolve claims made by customers when they sold less black pepper in the same-sized tin cans. Mondelez famously faced legal action in 2017 over putting more space between the peaks of Toblerone candy bars, and ended up reverting back to their previous shape.
I’m wondering if I should start practicing shrinkflation:
- maybe I will only cover 85% of the material in a chapter. If students end up learning only the debit part of a journal entry, well, what can I say. If they only learn how to complete 80% of a Balance Sheet, I’ll just blame it on shrinkflation.
- perhaps when I give someone a wedding gift, I’ll use the same size wedding card, but just put less cash in it
- maybe I’ll cut back on how many words are in my blog posts, but still charge the same amount. I’m sure no one would notice anyway.
Sources:
*image from
And here I thought shrinkflation was the odor emitting from my psychiatrist after eating a bean burrito for lunch.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I was counting on you to come up with an alternative defintion – and you didn’t disappoint! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. I attribute my success to all the advice I’ve heard from my shrink. Or was he even talking?
LikeLike
your shrink probably told you time was up five minutes before it really was, and charged you full price…
LikeLiked by 1 person
The bastard! And to think, the problem I came to him with was my complex over the size of my manhood.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess he’d heard, and seen, enough…
LikeLiked by 1 person
But it didn’t take long to show him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh boy have I seen this a lot over the last few years. Granola bars – less bars in a box. Frozen corn – smaller bags. Orange juice – less in the container. And many others. I get it, everything is going up. But those lame, crappy excuses kill me. I really hate it when companies think we are stupid.
LikeLiked by 2 people
companies could probably double the price of the stuff I buy in a grocery store, and I would have no idea. I just pick out what I want, go through the checkout, tap my phone to pay, and don’t ask for a receipt. hopefully when I retire I’ll be more diligent…
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is why I always count my Doritos.
LikeLiked by 3 people
and do you keep track of the numbers in a spreadsheet?
LikeLike
And the Pringles. Always count the Pringles.
LikeLiked by 1 person
has the number been shrinking?
LikeLike
I don’t know. I was being silly after reading The Dumbest Blogger’s comments. My bad.
I do agree with your post whole heartedly. I purchased some Motrin the other day and there were 6 tablets in the bottle. I assumed there would be more without reading the label. It kinda made me mad.
Great Post! 🤠🔥
LikeLiked by 1 person
the dumbest blogger’s posts will do that to you 🙂
and I wouldn’t be surprised if there are fewer pringles.
maybe they just ame the motrin more powerful, and one tablet is good for a whole month….
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is why I pay attention to the cost per fill in the blank as opposed to total cost. It doesn’t work for all products but helps with comparisons. Doublespeak is a good euphemism for the word I’d use. The sad thing is the people who put those statements together actually believe them. It is amazing how much a paycheck colors one’s judgment of honesty.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wish I was as diligent as you, but to be honest, I don’t know the price of most things I buy at the grocery store. and yes, many people will leave their values at the door when they go to work…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Those companies probably tout honesty as one of their core values. If a company makes honesty a core value, then by definition everything they do must be in accordance with that value.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m sure they do have honesty as a core value… reality may be quite different
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting. I like your idea of the wedding gift, but only if you are upfront about it and explain on the card exactly what you’re doing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d rather try and sneak the cheaper wedding gift past them 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
🤣
LikeLiked by 1 person
👍
LikeLike
It’s a clever way to increase your prices without actually doing so. I’ve not noticed that here with anything I buy. But I will pay more attention.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It would be interesting if it is only a United States thing, but my guess is that it is done around the globe…
LikeLiked by 1 person
All products should be individually packaged. One M&M to a bag. One Pringle to a box. One pickle to a jar. You will always know how much you are getting and how much it costs. But no one will be any happier.
LikeLiked by 2 people
then we will start to see half an M&M, half a pringle…
the packaging companies will be thrilled. think of all the packaging required…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Much like you, I have no problem with shrinkflation as long as companies are honest about it. Companies always have to think about the bottom line but don’t tell me the sky is really purple when I can see it’s not.
LikeLiked by 1 person
well said, Pete!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t have a clever comment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
it’s never stopped me 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve seen other justifications for this, the most hypocritical being that it was ‘better for our health’ that chocolate bars became smaller. Well done, Mars, who actually raised their prices here when Mars Bars shrank!
LikeLiked by 1 person
a double whammy from Mars! and how nice of them to think of our health…
LikeLiked by 1 person
recently read that Burger King is cutting back an order of chicken nuggets from 10 to 8. I’m sure the chickens are happy with this decision.
LikeLiked by 1 person
and so are our waistlines…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I will be leaving only 80% of a comm…
LikeLiked by 1 person
and it’s s till better than any comment I’ve ever left. maybe I should start doing the same thing…
eventually it will mean I’ll never have to leave any comment…
LikeLiked by 1 person
It happens here too. A good thing is that all (grocery) items (maybe not quantities of toilet paper sheets or tissues – though I think they are numbered) have their weight listed with a price per gram or 100 grams e.g.
LikeLiked by 1 person
we have the same thing here, but I wonder how many people remember the cost per whatever from one visit to the next
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t always take a lot of notice of price. I just buy what I want/need. I’m one of the lucky ones. Mind you, we don’t have huge wants or needs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I tend to be the same way; I just try to buy what I need, and so I would likely buy it no matter the price…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Same. *nods*
LikeLiked by 1 person
👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
Definitely!. The price of a crisp-style snack I buy was high, but I could get a 5-pack in the pound shop (as opposed to the supermarket’s 6-pack). Then it started coming on three-for two offers and the price stabilised, but I was sure we were getting less in an individual pack.
Then I went on a diet (yes, again) and looked at the calorie count on the packet – hmm. Not too bad.
But they’ve were out of stock at the supermarket and I bought the supermarket’s own brand substitute. They’re not as nice, but there seem to be more of them in an individual pack. When I looked at the calorie count – whoah! 100 calories per pack! The supermarket’s own brand clearly has yet to downsize to the level of the originals.
Should I halve the supermarket’s cheaper packs? (not much chance of that once they’re open)
Should I paying hiked prices for less of the nicer ones?
Should I stop eating the things altogether?
LikeLiked by 1 person
too many decisions to make 🙂
just do what makes you happy, and doesn’t make you go broke! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I knew about the McCormick incident. They really ended up looking bad on that one.
In business school there must be a class that trains marketed people how to talk like that. Lying and Equivocating 4301 or something like that. I’m guessing it is graduate level.
LikeLiked by 1 person
can you imagine such a course? You couldn’t trust a single thing that was said all semestr…
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are marketing people in the organization that I work for. Sometimes in meetings I exercise great self-control in not rolling my eyes.
I can watch the buzzword trends of the day course through marketing and then be replaced by the next trendy verbiage. It would be funny if it weren’t… nevermind, it is funny.
Currently all of our customers have to fit into a ‘persona’, because all people fit neatly into 4 or five bins, you know. So, great amounts of effort go into creating a presentation of personas that products are targeted at. This is called a marketechture, by the way, and they present all of this with a straight face.
If you want to really sound like a marketing genius, I have found that you need only to use nouns in the place of verbs and verbs in the place of nouns (I don’t know what to do with the adverbs). So there is “the ask”, and “the compare”, and “the compute”. Ehh, I should stop ranting.
LikeLike
I would love to sit in on one of those meetings, it must be complete BS.
I have seen students make presentations where they have created personas, like Susan. And then they describe what Susan is like, what she will but, and how they will market to her. Of course, Kathy is a completely diffferent persona…
LikeLiked by 1 person
It might hurt your eyes. I am probably too cynical. I am glad they never tried to put me in marketing.
LikeLike
The brand of TP I buy has the same number of sheets as before, but the roll is skinnier. I noticed when it was easier to put on the holder. I feel like they shaved close to a centimeter off. In the grand scheme of things, I don’t think it impacted me any, other than I feel like they’re trying to cheat me without me noticing. (I noticed.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
probably on a sheet by sheet piece a user would not notice the difference, but over seveal hundred sheets, that could mean a cost savings to the manufacturer…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
I actually don’t have much complaint when a company cuts back on a single serving container (like a small bag of chips or a can of soda). They are all probably too big anyway. My family buys 8 oz sodas at the store. I’m certain these are more expensive when you calculate in all the loss leader sales of the regular containers, but none of us wants 12 oz. That Gatorade quote would make me stop buying Gatorade outright, but I already don’t buy Gatorade.
LikeLiked by 1 person
8 oz seems like a nice size for a soda, but I do like a 12 or 16 ounce beer 🙂
good point that many of us would be better off healthwise with these downsizing moves…
LikeLike
I agree with you, if companies need to shrink portions, than okay, but be HONEST not deceitful about it! For that will lose my business a lot quicker!
LikeLiked by 1 person
agreed; honesty is the best policy…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought of something else after I posted. Remember McDonald’s icecream cones years ago! When I was a child it was like they piled them a mile high. I loved when my Dad would stop to get us some cones. They aren’t mile high cones anymore!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I do not remember McD’s ice cream cones – sounds like a good exmple of shrinkflation!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess they stand out to me because they were a special treat, its not like we went all the time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes, we used to go a burger place called Scottie’s when we were younger. this was before there was McDonalds. it was always a treat to go there…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree that honesty is the best policy but also I wonder who’s out there measuring the distances between the peaks in a toblerone bar lol… also, I take serious issue with having 5 less Dorito chips per bag!!!! LOL just kidding.. okay I know a lot of ppl (namely my husband would say that may be 5 chips per bag but the company is probably saving thousands just by doing something as small as that)! I always notice the ways in which consumers are paying for things that appear more/better than it actually is.. namely I always check the bottom of wine bottles to see how deep the divet is lol if you can put your whole thumb under the bottle you’re getting ripped off! Sorry, if you have no idea what I mean but I hope you do! lol
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know exactly what you are referring to with the wne bottle; it’s just another example of how many compaies try to trick us with hidden price increases…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I noticed a long time ago, Jim. The increase of COLA can never catch up with the shrinkflatation! I wonder as we age, would our appetite shrink in proportion to the shrinking among of produce and products we get at the same price? 🙂 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
that would be nice if our appetites shrunk over the years, exactly on pace with shrinkflation!
LikeLike
I just know that my husband used to eat a 16 oz. steak, but lately, he could only eat 6-8 oz. We’re not eating big meals anymore.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think I have noticed the same thing with my eating; I guess that’s a good thing!
LikeLike
It’s a good thing, Jim. Our bodies don’t burn as fast as years ago!
LikeLiked by 1 person
that is quite true!
LikeLike
😊😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
I now have to go convert that to a metric size (what we use in the big world out there) to find out if your husband is better off than my wife’s husband. I am 60, last time we bought stuff in ounces was in the 1960s. It kinda sound strange to me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I remember going through the changing of the measuring system. I now rely on the computer to give me the convention. 😄
LikeLiked by 1 person
What peeves me is when Berky wants my South African Rand, and lots thereof, and then to expect me to go figure how many litres of water I will get from a 2.037 gal filter. Why don’t they show both on their website? Perhaps 4.25% constitutes the majority of the global population, then. I am just of the 95.75% minority then.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, you’re the majority minority! Some websites show both conversions of certain measurements.
LikeLiked by 1 person
One should support such businesses. My other peeve is Anglophones changing names. Nikon (knee-koh) becomes “neyekon”, Yeshua became Jesus and Jakov became James. How does München become “mewnick” or Paraparaumu get turned into “paraparam?” The words even end differently. And both Jewish and Muslim people understand Yeshua from Isaiah 53, but who is this Jesus? They think he’s a Roman God. What’s silly, is that Anglophones in my city cannot pronounce Llandudno, Brackenfell or Buchan. Their own culture 😂😂😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am likely guilty as charged. The one that always bother me was saying Notre Dame so that it rhymed with Voter Fame…
LikeLike
😂👌
LikeLiked by 1 person
👍
LikeLike
that seems to be the right way to do things…
LikeLike
I have ato admit I do not know what Berky is. But I agree, such places should show numbers in both the local measurement system as wella s teh system of wherever the country is that is posting to the internet…
LikeLike
Berky is a very expensive water filtration system, portable for campers
LikeLiked by 1 person
ok, thanks for that clarification…
LikeLike
👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
how nice it is that we have the ability to look things up almost instantly, especially with our phones…
LikeLike
that’s why it would nice if there was just one universal measuring system. And I have to admit that I am confused by the phrase “my wife’s husband”… is that you?
LikeLike
That’s me, yes. There is an international standard, but 4.25% of this world lack the acumen to employ it. It really is an obstinate display of silliness.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂 👍
LikeLike
And we know it’s been going on for years. We now pay a dollar and a quarter for a ten cent candy bar that is smaller.
LikeLiked by 1 person
inflation, shrinkflation, and greed are a powerful combination…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just be honest and upfront and the consumer will probably not be upset. I always love your humor, Jim. You can shrinkflation on your post, but you will still have staunch readers. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
as always, honesty is the best policy. and thank you for your kind words!
LikeLike
It’s around the world thing, Jim..although here they just jack the price up and not by increments of 1 they shove it right up but that’s the stores not the manufacturers…manufacturers reduce the size…we lose either way 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
that does sound like a double whammy!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It certainly can be but tell me, Jim when does the consumer really win unless they are self sufficient 🙂 x
LikeLiked by 1 person
good point, Carol…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Almost none of the products ever get on my shopping list, as I am practical and only buy essentials. I never buy candy or chocolate bars and, at age 60, never tasted Toblerone or a Hershey.
LikeLiked by 1 person
wow – that is impressive to have never tried Hershey or Toblerone. I won’t go out of my way to buy a lot of junk food, but if it is in the house, I’ll eat it, unfortunately… 🙂
LikeLike
See, those never get into the house indeed
LikeLiked by 1 person
that’s the key…
LikeLike
Shrinkflation is a NWO strategy and part of rather accurate Biblical prophecy. It is one of the signs of the times.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As long as you use narrow fonts, we shouldn’t be able to tell a difference.
LikeLiked by 1 person
clever! you must work in marketing 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Only cynically.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol, I definitely like your ‘shrinkflation’ ideas much better than shady shrinkflation with lame excuses by big corporations. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wish companies would just be upfront about what theya re doing…
LikeLiked by 1 person