I found this response from Dan Ariely to a question he received from a reader quite interesting. Here was that question:
Dear Dan,
I’m a journalist at a small newspaper serving a community that is largely non-white and low income. I proposed doing a story about the environment, but the editorial board is concerned that this topic won’t resonate with our readers. How should I proceed?
Here was Dan’s response:
The perception that Americans of color and those with low incomes care less about the environment than white Americans may be common, but it is both patronizing and false.
In a 2018 study, researchers asked Americans how concerned they were—and how concerned they thought a variety of other people were—about environmental issues. Most respondents thought that young people, white people, and women were the most worried about the environment. But in reality, Latino, Asian, Black, and low-income Americans reported being the most concerned.
(I have to admit to being surprised at such results. If you want to think about why Latino, Asian, Black, and low-income Americans reported being the most worried about the environment, then pause for a second before reading the next paragraph, to see if your reasoning matches what the researchers found)
Dan’s response continues:
Why might these communities be particularly concerned about the environment? To begin with, they are disproportionately likely to live in neighborhoods with high levels of pollution, little green space, and high concentrations of waste sites. Daily exposure to environmental risks may raise awareness and concern among Americans of color and those with low incomes.
So your editorial board is most likely wrong. To help such a story resonate with your readership—and to correct misperceptions around the issue—you might consider reporting your story in a way that reflects the ethnic and economic diversity of those who are concerned about the environment.
The results make sense to me.
I think most of us tend to be primarily concerned with the issues and problems we face each day.
If we face uncertainty about where our next meal will come from, that is probably on our mind 24/7. Issues such as the dispute in Ukraine are likely not something we would spend a lot of time thinking about.
If we have a sick relative whom we are caring for, that person becomes the focus of our world. Concern about whether a movie theater is going to be opening again is likely given little to no consideration.
So yes, it stands to reason that if Latino, Asian, Black, and low-income Americans are faced with environmental-related issues every day, such issues will be of primary concern to them. An individual not dealing with such problems on a daily basis might care about such issues, but likely not with the same deep concern as people who do have to deal with such concerns as part of their daily routine.
So I agree, such an article should be written by the reporter, not only to make people aware of the environmental issues but to also highlight who is most affected by such environmental issues.
*image from Dreamstime
Obviously a small-minded editor assuming that he know more than he does. The key word is ASSuming.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Who wouldn’t care about their environment? After all, isn’t our environment what we have to live in?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think the issue is the degree to which one cares about the environment. I was just surprised by what the research seems to suggest as the groups that seem to care the most…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess it is kind of surprising. I would have thought such concern was pretty evenly distributed, all around.
LikeLiked by 1 person
you would think so…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I found this word use (Latino, Asian, Black, and low-income Americans) quite interesting. What about White Americans? And I see you steer away from using the term African-American.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was jusat copying the word usage from Dan’s email. And I have to admit I am never quite sure what is the proper term, blacks or African American…
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a pretty condescending attitude to think that just because someone isn’t wealthy means, they’re less likely to care about the environment. That implies that more affluent people are somehow more socially conscious, which is also wrong.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I agree it is a condescending attittude, and such attitudes make me wonder if that is the result of the environment the person grew up in and doesn’t know any better. or is it an attitude they consciously chose….
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s nice
LikeLike
Maybe you are more concerned about the environment when the water you drink comes out of the tap rather than a fancy plastic bottle. Just a theory…
LikeLiked by 1 person
great point.
and on a realted note, I know for a while my kids got so used to drinking out of the water cooler we have in our house that they wanted no parts of the water from the faucet. we have since stopped the water delivery, so now there’s no choice!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think that the groups that we expect to care the most are the ones who get the most media coverage – white people, children, etc. – his reply though was spot on if you think about it. the average person who lives and works in places predominately made up of a lower socio-economic base, are the ones most impacted in day to day life by this, who can least afford to take time off to protest or be active in the cause, and also have the least public voice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
great point Beth about the individuals most impacted by these issues sometimes don’t have the time or the soapbox to stand up to raise their concerns…
LikeLiked by 1 person
and they don’t have connections or power, so many don’t even feel it’s worth trying I’m guessing
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree it is a condescending attitude. There are so many affluent and privileged people who think they care about the environment who are clueless and too selfish to do much about it. Having concern about the environment is not the same as showing concerns by taking actions.
LikeLiked by 2 people
reminds me of one of my favorite bumper stickers: “Think globally, act locally”. It’s nice to think about the issues, but the key is to do something, to act…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Condescending indeed. Maybe that’s why he is the editor of a small paper, rather than anything with a bigger circulation? As others have said, those who have the wealth to do something about the environment rarely use it to good effect, and editors like this probably fear a loss of ad revenue if they speak out.
LikeLiked by 3 people
and you wonder if the editor’s attitude is the result of the environment he grw up in, or is an attitude he cultivated himself over the years. Neither way makes it right to have such an attitude, but I think some people just don’t know any better. ANd good point about the money; it always come back to that…
LikeLiked by 1 person
He probably doesn’t know any better but I’d like to think someone in his position would. Maybe I’m too naive.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree that someone in such a position should be informed on such matters, or at least be willing to learn about the issues…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Therein lies the problem. Too many are convinced that they know right to even consider the possibility that they don’t, and that there might be more to learn.
LikeLiked by 1 person
not knowing what you don’t know is a dangerous position to be in…
LikeLiked by 1 person
And made worse by not knowing that you don’t know it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
Their also appears to be another assumption here that wasn’t discussed. The assumption that people of colour and or lower income are less intelligent and not as able to absorb or analyze the information presented to them. This to me is the more concerning trend than “they don’t care”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I had a sense of that assumption underlying the editor’s response as well…
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is not a hard one folks. My guess the answer depends on which environmental issues you’re talking about. The editor may be right if the story is about the Paris Climate Accords or sea level rise in the Maldives. On the other hand, if the story is about things like apartments with lead paint on the walls, polluted municipal water systems that are ignored (Flint, MI), the industrial plant in the neighborhood, or the effect of high levels of air pollution on their respiratory systems, then the editor is dead wrong. People in poor neighborhoods are definitely more interested in those matters than the average suburbanite.
LikeLiked by 1 person
well said. I think we are all like that. we primarily care about the things that directly affect us, and many of us don’t have the luxury to think beyond those issues…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dan, you were spot on! Jim, this is a really important point. It depends on who you are and where you are.
LikeLiked by 1 person
and it’s that way with so many things…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmmm, a most interesting post, Jim. I have my own views on most peoples real attitudes towards ‘saving the planet’ and what sacrifices they are really willing to make. I’ve incorporated them into my latest short story.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I always like how you are able to work your beliefs and knowledge into your stories!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Some people criticize me for it – smile – it’s a good thing I had thick skin when it comes to my writing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
An interesting post and comments, Jim…If anyone watched the “The Earth shot” programme that highlighted that fact many of the ideas came from people from ethnic minorities and poorer countries, not all I will add but many people have the mindset that I’m alright Jack because they can…or they run the big conglomerates that effectively shackle the farmers etc which if you listen to the podcast on this Monday Musings it highlights just that…income needs to be more fairly distributed…
LikeLiked by 2 people
thanks for sharing that info, Carol. I’m all in favor of fairer income distribution…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting stuff, and I agree with you, Jim. But as a former reporter on a small paper myself, i’d also suggest that journalist gets out there and speaks to people. Ah, miss those days….cheers!
LikeLiked by 1 person
a reporter for a small paper always seemed like an appealing job. and I agree, a good reporter needs to be out in the field talking to people…
LikeLike
Few tales to tell, low pay too though
LikeLiked by 1 person
you’re making it sound even more appealing 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha ha, cheers Jom
LikeLiked by 1 person
Or Jim even….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jom has a nice ring to it…
LikeLiked by 1 person
😃
LikeLiked by 1 person
You make a good point – we are concerned with things that affect us directly and immediately before we focus on other things.
I feel that white people are perceived as more worried about the environment because they speak about it more often. Or at least the media makes it seem so. However, we cannot judge things based on the loudest voice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
it’s a shame that the loudest voice is often the one that get heard the most…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t much that’s new so will simply agree. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
that was easy 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
You had good points, and excellent follow-up comments.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m lucky – the comments are always better than my post 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person