I was scrolling through my phone this morning and I came across this short story about Twitter and its stock performance yesterday (Thursday):
Shares of Twitter Inc. slid 5.56% to $34.48 Thursday, on what proved to be an all-around rough trading session for the stock market, with the S&P 500 Index falling 2.44% to 4,477.44 and Dow Jones Industrial Average falling 1.45% to 35,111.16. This was the stock’s second consecutive day of losses. Twitter Inc. closed $46.27 below its 52-week high ($80.75), which the company achieved on February 25th.
The stock demonstrated a mixed performance when compared to some of its competitors Thursday, as Microsoft Corp. fell 3.90% to $301.25, Alphabet Inc. fell 3.32% to $2,861.80, and Meta Platforms Inc. fell 26.39% to $237.76. Trading volume (32.5 M) eclipsed its 50-day average volume of 18.5 M.
Short and sweet.
But what I found most interesting was found after the story in an Editor’s Note:
This story was auto-generated by Automated Insights, an automation technology provider, using data from Dow Jones and FactSet.
What!? No human intervention was involved in generating that story. This could be another example of a profession, like pinboys and doctors, being replaced by technology. What’s to become of journalists?
I don’t think anyone would be able to tell that the above blurb about Twitter was written by a machine and not a human.
So I had to check out the company Automated Insights; here are some interesting tidbits I learned.
The company has a product called Wordsmith (great name), which it describes as a self-service natural language generation platform. This NLG “gives companies complete control over transforming data into insightful narrative, all at an unprecedented speed and scale.”
And they seem to mean it when they say unprecedented speed and scale. Apparently, Wordsmith allows companies to “generate millions of narratives in a matter of milliseconds with the Wordsmith API”.
Many prominent companies are using Wordsmith:
- The Associated Press used NLG to automate NCAA Division I men’s basketball previews during the 2018 season allowing their journalists to focus on writing critical, qualitative articles.
- Yahoo! Sports uses NLG to produce over 70 million reports and match recaps—each one unique—that help engage, monetize, and delight its massive user base.
- The Orlando Magic (a professional basketball team) uses Wordsmith to generate personalized in-app and email messages to each of their fans, boosting loyalty program engagement and season ticket renewals.
After reading about all that Wordsmith could do, I thought maybe I could find a use for it.
Perhaps I could share all my WP stats (views comments, likes, geographic, most popular time of day/week for posts, number of followers, etc.) with Wordsmith, and every day it would autogenerate a story about my stats that I could post to my blog.
Now if you were to read such a post, you may not recognize if it’s me or Wordsmith. But if you see a straight month’s worth of posts about my stats, then you’ll know I’ve decided to let the robots take over for a while.
My only concern might be my reaction if my WP stats increased exponentially right after the robot took over my blog…
*image from the New York Times
P.S. I just realized after I posted this that I had written a blog post about robot journalism nearly six years ago: Is It Live, or Is It Memorex? and I featured the WordSmith program…
Either a machine or a very boring person because it certainly isn’t catching my attention. Just the facts. But then again it could be the subject matter. I could see how it could be used in sports summaries.
LikeLiked by 3 people
goodpoint; perhaps the use of such technologies is better suited for more fact-based writing…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry but I think your stats may fall significantly if you try letting a Wordsmith do your blog. You know how “exciting” I think numbers are, right? I may have mentioned my dislike for numbers and math, once or twice. 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
so maybe such a program would be perfect for you, so that you cold thrown in an occasional number-oriented blog, without having to do anything…
LikeLike
To the not that wrote this post: nice try, buddy.
LikeLiked by 2 people
uh-oh; my readers are on to me…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Now, all we need is for Wordsmith to poke fun at itself ala Borden style.
LikeLiked by 2 people
everybody else makes fun of me, so it should be easy for a robot…
LikeLike
Not surprising that after writing your blog for as long as you have that you may not retrace a few steps now and again. But I assure you, I could pick out your writing from a bot with little effort. Plus, can Wordsmith juggle?
LikeLiked by 3 people
I’m sure it’s easy topick out my writing – the poor grammar, misspellings, poor word choice, etc.
and I am sure there robots that can juggle much better than I ever could!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe you can teach a machine the technique, but they don’t have that Borden flair!
LikeLiked by 1 person
a machine would probably figure out pretty quickly it’s got better things to do with its time than to try and replicate my nonsense…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Quincy the Wordsmith just doesn’t have the same ring to it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
it may not have the same ring to it but if it saves me an hour or two per day, I’m all in…
LikeLiked by 1 person
it could never match my level of spelling and grammatical errors, lack of capital letters, things out of alignment, poor errors in judgement, putting odd parts together that look like they may not fit but kind of do into one piece, or attempts at humor. the bot would be exposed immediately. i believe the same for you, with all of your human style and quirks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
it’s nice to have a unique style that is hard to replicate.
and should I be happy that I have quirks? 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hahaha and hard to define. Yes you should be happy for that
LikeLiked by 1 person
ok; I’ll take your word for it!
LikeLike
I wish I had something funny to say but this comment is robot generated and the programming isn’t geared to duplicate human humor, yet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
but it’s still better than any comment I’ve ever left…
LikeLiked by 1 person
In the battle of man versus robot…the robot triumphs again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve been seeing ads about this technology for about a year now. So not only will I be replaced at work by an accounting program but at my hobby by an automated blog scribe. I guess this isn’t a new phenomena, programs have been able to generate better artwork than 99% of humans for years now. Here’s something I think: when reading creative writing, you are making a connection with another human being (even if that human doesn’t know it). If something is written by a machine, there’s no human connection. Is it worth reading. Would anyone go to a baseball homerun derby if machines were at bat? I think a lot of what goes on around us, we appreciate because someone else has has taken the time to do it. A stat heavy stock report? Sure. But an analysis of the human condition? I dunno.
LikeLiked by 1 person
you make a lot of valid points; a robot homerun derby sounds terrible.
and I sometimes worry about whether teaching students how to do accounting is teaching them a skill that won’t be in demand any longer.
I’m glad I’m getting close to retirement…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sounds like some pretty interesting technology.
I would also be worried if the starts skyrocketed as soon as I got replaced…
LikeLiked by 1 person
but maybe no one have to know that we were replaced… 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it’s a good idea. It’s what I’ve done with my comments. I think it’s a good idea. It’s what I’ve done with my comments.
LikeLiked by 2 people
😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
lol… it seems like you may need to upgrade to the latest version…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m always asking for an upgrade. Along with a fresh oil can and new bearings.
LikeLiked by 1 person
my joints could use a good lube job…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Are joints legal in PA?
LikeLiked by 1 person
inside a voting booth…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Myself, I welcome our robot overlords. They clearly have better grammar and word usage than the cesspool of content writers out there. 🤖
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wonder if robots would be any good at terrible poetry…
LikeLiked by 1 person
You know, it’s been done! My husband is a programmer so he’s shown me lots of stuff involving AI-generated creations.
LikeLiked by 1 person
maybe you need to open up your terrible poetry competition to robots… 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m non-discriminatory.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fox News should use it. Might be the closest they ever got to reporting the truth…
LikeLiked by 1 person
great idea!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Jim, I think that computer generated updates are idea for this sort of thing where the content is short, factual, and frequent.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree. These automated postings work well for some content, but not so well for other types…
LikeLike
Journalism these days sounds like this: “This guy sucks and I don’t like him.” WHAT? Long gone are the days of true journalism, so I actually am not as opposed to this automation as I thought I would be. Plus, analyzing data is known for giving headaches, so – win-win.
What I’m NOT looking forward to is the day when books written by robots push real authors off the shelves.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes. we need to bring back those smoke filled newsrooms with the sound of typewriters clicking away and every day has a bottle of scotch in its bottom drawer. perhaps that’s what it takes to have true journalism.
and let’s hope that robots never replace real authors…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, I’d like that! I think a lot of office work would go better if it was ‘OK’ to have a bit of scotch here and there. It’s OK to have a display of coffee and tea but not fine liquor? Why?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree. it would be like having an all-day happy hour…
LikeLiked by 1 person
And you would get to save your money by not having to go out…
LikeLiked by 1 person
but then you would spend that saving on taking an uber home every day…
LikeLiked by 1 person
You would from the bar, anyway.
LikeLiked by 1 person
👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
The writings on the wall then but it has been for a long time…Would my bread recipe be better if a robot wrote it and made it…??…Mmmmmm if cut bread is anything to go by then the answer is in the negative…
LikeLiked by 1 person
perhaps just writingout the basic facts of the recipe would be a perfect job for a recipe. but adding the human touch requires a person…
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is fascinating… but there’s something satisfying about writing your own words.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree, Jennie. But I woder from the reader’s perspective if they would even know, or even care, if something was written by a human or robot, as long as they enjoyed what they read…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah ha! Good point, especially from the reader’s perspective.
LikeLiked by 1 person
👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
ha, it’s like you’re only now running out of things to write about! I’m not sure how I feel about a bot writing my weekly posts but maybe if I were in a pinch? Like a simple post?? I’d be down for that! lol
LikeLiked by 1 person
sounds reasonable to me; but as I noted there’s a good chance a bot does a better job than me. so maybe I should let it write for a few times per week 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person