After reading about this cognitive bias, I feel like I need to change all of my social media pictures from individual photos to group photos, preferably a group photo where everyone is better-looking than me, which is easily done. In fact, it would be impossible for that not to happen.
The reason? The cheerleader effect.
The cheerleader effect, also known as the group attractiveness effect, is the cognitive bias that causes people to think individuals are more attractive when they are in a group.
The phrase was coined by the fictional character Barney Stinson (Neil Patrick Harris) in “Not a Father’s Day”, an episode of the television series How I Met Your Mother, first aired in November 2008. Barney points out to his friends a group of women that initially seem attractive, but who are all unattractive when examined individually.
This was followed up by research in 2013 by Drew Walker and Edward Vul of the University of California, San Diego, in which they did five experiments wherein subjects rated the attractiveness of people in photographs. Some people were pictured alone, and others were in groups. (Sometimes the “groups” were actually collages of people alone.)
In every case, for men and women, the people in groups got higher attractiveness ratings. Walker reasoned: “Average faces are more attractive, likely due to the averaging out of unattractive idiosyncrasies.”
Walker and Vul concluded that “Having a few wingmen or wingwomen may indeed be a good dating strategy.”
It may also be a way for me to not immediately turn people away from my Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn pages as well as my WordPress About Me page. Such turning away can wait until people actually browse through such sites.
I need to find that photo of me and my wingmen – Brad Pitt, George Clooney, and Tom Cruise – hanging out on the Riviera. Once I do, you’ll find it on all my social media pages. It’s the ultimate averaging process for a guy like me.
I just hope the sudden surge in my popularity doesn’t overwhelm the servers…
sources:
This makes me wish I had an identical twin, as that would make me look more attractive. Especially if he was a Siamese twin, always attached to me, so that we would always be in a group. But this study seems like a no-brainer, as I don’t think I’ve ever seen a group of cheerleaders that looked unattractive. What an easy way to earn some grant money, by the U of C.
LikeLiked by 2 people
and it seems like the research was motivated by a TV comedy show…
I should see if there is something I can research based on a Curb Your Enthusiasm episode…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, that’s another amazing thing, that a TV show inspired the research. So heck, Professor Borden, here’s your chance to get a research grant.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m already the laughingstock of the business school, so I’d have nothing to lose…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good luck with that! I found that for me, I look at the individual’s faces and not the group. So who knows? Everyone is different.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I remember that episode of How I Met Your Mother.
LikeLiked by 2 people
you are the second person to mention that; I only watched a few episodes of the show, and this one did not ring a bell…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can offer up my Photoshop skills to help in that picture department. Maybe building cheerleader group shots could become a side business.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I am sure there are lots of people out there who would pay money to help them look better!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lots of different types of “cognitive bias” and I wonder how many of them were initiated by someone suffering fro the Dunning-Kruger Effect, also an example of “cognitive bias”. And … just don’t get me started on “unconscious bias” 🤣🤣
LikeLiked by 2 people
cognitive biases fascinate me, and I wrote about the Dunning-Kruger effect a long time ago. https://jborden.com/2016/05/12/the-dunning-kruger-effect/
and I’ve gone through training on unconscious bias…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perhaps you could write about your experience on the unconscious bias training ….. the concept, the specific context, your learning and how your unconscious “changed” !
LikeLiked by 1 person
I did one post about it a while ago: https://jborden.com/2017/10/17/your-data-suggest-a-strong-automatic-association-for-male-with-career-and-female-with-family/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Jim, just read it, and now 4 years on there is still no substantiated evidence of reliability OR validity of these IATs. When I was taking my psychology degree it was drilled into us that this was the essence of any meaningful “test or profile”. Then when I was designing tests for use in organisations it would be the first thing I was asked about.
LikeLiked by 1 person
that’s good to know about the the lack of reliability or validity of such tests; does that suggest that we aren’t as subconsciously biased as we are led to believe?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Jim, not necessarily. It suggests that the tests are crap though😂 Their efficacy would be destroyed by a half decent psychologist in 5 mins! Here’s the question, if your child was given an ability test at age 11 to determine their education stream, and the test was known to have low reliability (result varies from day to day or week to week) plus low validity (no evidence correlated by other tests proving it IS measuring what it says it does), would you be happy? Thought not!
LikeLiked by 1 person
thanks, Dr. B. good analogy with the ability test for an 11-year old.
despite such lack of results, we seem to love to give such tests!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t know what to make of this. I would say that when people are hanging out with their friends, they are more likely to be laughing. When we see jovial people having fun and laughing, we might see them as more attractive.
LikeLiked by 6 people
very insightful, Pete. That is what the author of the article The Atlantic concluded as well…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have a life size cardboard cutout of myself which my oldest son made for me. I position it in all group photos and then I can take the picture without trying to make a selfie or having to ask some stranger to snap it. I never age and presume I will be in family pictures after I die. If someone else is taking the photo, I often appear twice. I can drape different clothes on the shoulders and I am positioned in the back row. Many people never notice.
LikeLiked by 6 people
that’s funny, and clever. can you fold it up and take it with you on vacations?
LikeLike
It travels well on driving trips.
LikeLiked by 1 person
have you tried to use it while driving in a high occupancy lane?
LikeLike
No. That’s an interesting thought. It works well in photographs because everyone else in the picture is flattened into two dimensions. But if the State Patrol drove by, it would look like a thin piece of cardboard propped up in the seat. I could afford the ticket but not the embarrassment!
LikeLiked by 1 person
it would make for a good blog post…
LikeLike
Life advice from Barney Stinson that actually works 🤣
LikeLiked by 2 people
you offer enough advice, at some point, some of it is going to be helpful 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Love your theoretical thoughts on this. Now, I wonder if the size of the group has any impact. By the way, congratulations on reaching 2000 followers. Another great milestone for a fantastic blog!
LikeLiked by 3 people
thanks, Brad,,,, and good question. The research seemed to suggest that the size of the group did not have any impact on this effect.
and thanks for the congrats – I think I’ll treat myself to one Oreo cookie today 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds like the perfect reward!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought so!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am hoping for funding for my schitt’s creek research, stat!
personally, I am more self-conscious when having pictures taken of me alone, so maybe I look more relaxed and happy in group photos, no matter the group, even if random strangers.
LikeLiked by 4 people
I think Schitt’s Creek would provide a wealth of research opportunities 🙂
and that’s an interesting point about being self-conscious in individual photos; seems like a viable explanation…
LikeLike
Interesting information, I suppose what is being said here does make sense.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I guess most people tend to focus on the group overall, and not any particular individual in such photos…
LikeLiked by 1 person
In a group picture there is much more ‘noise’ so you don’t examine each individual as closely so flaws are better hidden.
LikeLiked by 1 person
that seems to be the case, and perhaps the more photos there are, the more flaws can be hidden!
LikeLike
How interesting! I think that the happiness level is very likely a contributing factor, but since we are talking about the subconscious could there be a level of competition where everyone is making their best effort to look prettier than the one next to them? It may tie in with what Beth said about being self conscious since in this situation everyone is putting their best face forward and none of them is looking at each other to see what they may be doing.
LikeLiked by 3 people
these all seem like legitimate reasons for why there is such an effect. I get the sense all of you are ready to do some applied research on this topic 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, yes and then we will all submit photos to be photoshopped into one big happy and attractive group photo 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
the bloggers of wordpress…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I look my best in group photos when I have my back to the camera. I wonder what the research could do with that.
And some research based on Ted Lasso could be good too: how to make everyone around you happy when you’re failing…
LikeLiked by 2 people
everyone would wonder who the mystery man is, and everyone likes a good mystery.
and Ted Lasso would be a good show to research, only because it would require me to watch the first season all over again 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll try it – I’ve always hated having my photo taken.
A good excuse for some research, I think. They are showing Little Birds here again at present, so I’m seeing a lot of the lovely Juno…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve never heard of Little Birds, so I just checked, and here is what I found:
The series made its US premiere on the Starz channel on 6 June 2021.
Unfortunately we do not get the Starz channel; it sounds like a good show…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry, as it is on the Sky Atlantic channel here I thought it was an American production, as that is what that channel mostly airs. Turns out it is British, partly made around the Mediterranean. Here’s a bit more about it – you’ll see why I’m enjoying it for the second time 😉 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9849190/
LikeLike
hmmmm…. watched the trailer, not sure if that is my style…
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s based on writings by Anais Nin – a little bit decadent and risqué 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
that’s what I gathered!
LikeLiked by 1 person
But it’s a lot of fun 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
Look forward to seeing that group photo of you! LOL!
Hmmm….now I am going to have to look at my photos and see what I think. Glad you brought this important study to my attention. Now I have an excuse to not have my picture taken. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
I may have to get their approval before I can post the photo, after all, I am bringing down the average of how good they look…
and I only share the most groundbreaking research out there…
LikeLiked by 1 person
But surely they would want the fame of being posted on such a famous blog. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m pretty sure they already follow it…
LikeLike
😂 You are so humble!
LikeLiked by 1 person
it is one of my more endearing qualities 🙂
LikeLike
Oh gosh!
LikeLiked by 1 person
👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
This cognitive bias is very interesting. I wonder if the cheerleader effect works if all the others in the group were also pictures of me. Nah, that would make things worse, I’m sure. 😊
Also congrats on 2,000 followers. We were just about tied a couple of months ago. You’ve zoomed past me. 😃
LikeLike
I vaguely remember this when I watched HIMYM. Very fascinating study and in a way, I get it. 😏 I better stick to my group at all times lol
LikeLiked by 1 person
that’s what I plan to do!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha! This is amazing. I need to organize a group photo, pronto.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I might do some photo editing…
LikeLike
Damn, that’s genuinely the first time I’ve ever heard of this cognitive bias. That’s really interesting to know!
I’m also really fascinated with these psychological biases and effects too
LikeLiked by 1 person
first time for me as well; and there are so many biases out there…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha ha, amusing jim. Are you, clooney et al the four horsemen of the apocalypse? Just sayin….
LikeLiked by 1 person
it’s more like the three horsemen, and me, the stable boy…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Like it! Cheers Jim
LikeLiked by 1 person
🤓
LikeLike