In today’s class, I showed the wonderful Dan Pink TED talk on motivation (yes, the same Dan Pink who many of you pointed out the other day needs to work on his hand washing).
In part of the video, Dan introduces the candle problem, which is shown in the image above.
The problem was developed by psychologist Karl Duncker in 1945 and it works as follows:
Bring the subjects into a room with a table pushed up against the wall. On the table there is a candle, a box full of tacks, and a book of matches. Their challenge is to affix the lit candle to the wall so that it will not drip wax onto the table below.
Here is the solution:
The problem is with functional fixedness. When people see the box full of tacks, that’s all they originally see. They do not think that the box might have another use, such as a holder for the candle.
In 1962 Sam Glucksberg, a Canadian professor at Princeton repeated this problem but this time he had two groups of people solve the task. To one group he offered a monetary incentive for the fastest time to solve the problem, and the other group he did not. What happened?
The subjects who were offered the incentive, on average, took 3.5 minutes longer to solve the problem than those who weren’t.
Glucksberg concluded that the monetary incentive acted as a sort of mental block, and made it harder for people to think creatively.
Glucksberg then modified the problem as shown below:
This time, the subjects who were offered the incentive performed better than the control group. Dan Pink refers to this as the Candle Problem for Dummies, noting that when the tacks are out of the box, it’s easier to imagine the box being used in a different way.
Pink uses the example to highlight the dangers associated with traditional incentives. Incentives such as “if you do this, then you get that”, work well for well-defined tasks, such as the Candle Problem for Dummies. However, for tasks that require even rudimentary thinking, such carrot and stick incentives don’t work. What is needed is a different way of thinking about motivation.
This is where Pink introduces the idea of intrinsic motivation and highlights the power of autonomy, mastery, and purpose to get the highest level of performance from individuals.
While to me there is nothing new about the power of intrinsic motivators (Frederick Herzberg talked about his two-factor theory of motivation back in the mid-1960s), Pink does a great job of making the concepts easy to understand in an engaging and enjoyable way and using current-day examples to bolster his arguments.
Here is the Dan Pink TED talk in case you are interested; it is about 20 minutes long and has over nine million views…
*images from What Is Motivation
That’s too funny about people overlooking the box itself as a tool. I probably would. Oh, the human brain! 😎
LikeLiked by 1 person
that solution would not have jumped out at me; probably would have tried a few other things first, none of which would have worked… 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙃
LikeLiked by 1 person
I remember the “barrel problem” in college, which very much changed my awareness of the way I tend to think. The task was simply to write down as many uses for a wooden barrel as I could come up with in one minute. Most of us wrote down variations on uses that fit the functional description of a “barrel”, which is to store things. But I also remember someone in the class using the steel hoop as a Hula Hoop, and someone else wanting to use two staves as skis.
The instructor described my type of thinking as “convergent”… treating the problem in the way of a math problem with one “correct” answer. But for those who “disassembled” the barrel or who found novel or creative uses, she described it as “divergent” thinking. As a student in a hard science, it was pointed out that we had been trained to think in a convergent manner, or to derive a correct solution. But she went on to point out that those who come up with truly groundbreaking ideas have usually applied at least some divergent thought… Archimedes’ “Eureka!”, Kekulé’s dream, or Einstein’s intuition.
LikeLiked by 1 person
that sounds like it was a great exercise, and its message has obviously stuck with you. It seems as if having a bit of both convergent and divergent thinking would be the best of both worlds…
LikeLiked by 1 person
With the tacks in the box, one really has to think out of it to solve the conundrum.
LikeLiked by 1 person
it is amazing what such a little change in situation can do to our thinking…
LikeLiked by 1 person
How strange that having the tacks in a box throws us off so much. It doesn’t say much for our cognitive skills if something like that can throw us off.
I do find it interesting that adding a monetary element slows down people from solving the problem. I do think that we can put undue pressure on ourselves. It’s like telling yourself to fall asleep and then not being able to do so.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess we get so used to thinking that certain items just have a specific use.
And as for the money, it was a clever study showing that sometimes incentives work, it just depends on the nature of the problem.
LikeLiked by 1 person
this literally supports the ‘think out of the box’ approach to solving a problem.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was thinking the same thing; I was going to give that as a hint, but I thought that might make it too easy. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m simple )
LikeLiked by 1 person
p.s. the video was great and i love how he rolled it all out to conclusion, surprising in some ways, but his examples and arguments make sense
LikeLiked by 1 person
the Dan Pink and Ken Robinson videos are my two favorite TED talks. And they are both great authors as well…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dan want on my radar before but thanks for brimming him to my attention
LikeLiked by 1 person
Okay, I am now officially a member of the Dan pink fan club! His talk was done so well and delivered with energy and enthusiasm. He is such a good speaker. Guess law school came in handy anyway. Great post to share, Jim! Wish I could make every manager in America watch it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m with you, Brad. He is a phenomenal speaker, and I think it catapulted him to the next level. I think he was already a successful author, but this brought him into the big time…
And at least 100 students per year are going out into the business world having seen this video 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is very interesting, Jim. I know that I’ve never been motivated by money but rather by other things. Corporates find it very hard to get their minds around that, they only really have money in their repertoire of incentives up until recently. Now part time work and softer incentives exist, but do they work – NO! because the corporate mind set hasn’t shifted.
LikeLike
And I was thinking I’d just tack the candle to the part of the wall that’s away from the table. That would have been one messed up candle after I finished with it. By by god, I would have demanded payment for my services.
LikeLiked by 1 person
your solution may work, but it may also burn down the building 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
“The solution is on the periphery” is my mantra. Pink is a fantastic speaker!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree, Margie! And he is a fantastic author as well…
LikeLiked by 1 person
You rescued Dan’s reputation with this excellent video.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m glad, since I did not mean to harm it. He is one of my favorite authors and speakers…
LikeLike
Good stuff Quincy 💛
LikeLiked by 1 person
thanks, Val 🙂
LikeLike
So now get rid of grades in education.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d be happy to (I think most teachers will probably say that grading is the least favorite part of their job), but I think most students like to know how they are doing, and employers, for better or worse, like to see grades as part of the initial screening process.
LikeLike
Omg that’s so interesting! I’m off to watch the video- I need to know more lol!
LikeLiked by 1 person
enjoy; I am a big fan of Dan Pink’s books…
LikeLiked by 2 people
I jumped on the video right away and stick to it because he made me laugh in the beginning haha 😀 Thanks for sharing. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
it’s a great video; very informative but also entertaining. he is a great speaker…
LikeLiked by 2 people
This is great research that could impact how teachers (and families) provide incentives for learning and behavior! Thank you for sharing!
LikeLiked by 2 people
you are welcome!
LikeLiked by 1 person