The title comes from one of the quizzes available on Adam Grant’s website.
Who is Adam Grant you may ask?
Here’s a brief bio from his website:
Adam Grant has been Wharton’s (the business school at the University of Pennsylvania) top-rated professor for 7 straight years. As an organizational psychologist, he is a leading expert on how we can find motivation and meaning, and live more generous and creative lives. He has been recognized as one of the world’s 10 most influential management thinkers and Fortune’s 40 under 40.
He is the #1 New York Times bestselling author of 5 books that have sold millions of copies and been translated into 35 languages: Think Again, Give and Take, Originals, Option B, and Power Moves. His books have been named among the year’s best by Amazon, Apple, the Financial Times, and the Wall Street Journal. His New York Times article on languishing is one of the most-shared articles of 2021.
Adam hosts WorkLife, a chart-topping TED original podcast. His TED talks on original thinkers and givers and takers have been viewed more than 30 million times. He received a standing ovation at TED in 2016 and was voted the audience’s favorite speaker at The Nantucket Project. His speaking and consulting clients include Google, the NBA, Bridgewater, and the Gates Foundation. He writes on work and psychology for the New York Times, has served on the Defense Innovation Board at the Pentagon, and has been honored as a Young Global Leader by the World Economic Forum. He has more than 5 million followers on social media and features new insights in his free monthly newsletter, GRANTED.
Not too shabby. By comparison; here is my bio:
Jim Borden has taught at the Villanova School of Business for 35 years.
Anyway, I have read all of Adam’s books, except for his latest, Think Again.
Here is a brief description of the book:
Intelligence is usually seen as the ability to think and learn, but in a rapidly changing world, there’s another set of cognitive skills that might matter more: the ability to rethink and unlearn. In our daily lives, too many of us favor the comfort of conviction over the discomfort of doubt. We listen to opinions that make us feel good, instead of ideas that make us think hard. We see disagreement as a threat to our egos, rather than an opportunity to learn. We surround ourselves with people who agree with our conclusions, when we should be gravitating toward those who challenge our thought process. The result is that our beliefs get brittle long before our bones. Intelligence is no cure, and it can even be a curse: there’s evidence that being good at thinking can make us worse at rethinking. The brighter we are, the blinder to our own limitations we can become.
It is on my reading list, but in the meantime, I figured I’d take the quiz to see “how often I think again”. The quiz has 10 questions and takes about five minutes.
Here was the feedback I received:
In our daily lives, we often think like preachers, prosecutors, politicians, and scientists. Psychologists find that we enter preacher mode when we’re defending a sacred value, prosecutor mode when we’re trying to win an argument, politician mode when we’re campaigning for the approval of an audience, and scientist mode when we’re searching for the truth. These mental modes affect our will to question our own opinions and our skill to open other people’s minds.
Here are your scores:–
Preacher: 20%
Prosecutor: 0%
Politician: 0%
Scientist: 80%
Other: 0%
Preaching and prosecuting can be effective approaches to opening minds when people don’t hold strong opinions and don’t care deeply about an issue. However, they run the risk of alienating people with deep-seated convictions on topics that matter to them. These modes can also leave us so determined to prove ourselves right and others wrong that we fail to do much rethinking ourselves.
When we’re in politician mode, we’re more focused on building support and more willing to revise our beliefs. The danger is that we come across as hypocrites and change our minds at the wrong times for the wrong reasons.
It’s in scientist mode that we gain mental flexibility. We search for reasons why we might be wrong (not just reasons why we must be right) and revise our opinions based on what we learn. That puts us in a better position to help others learn too.
I like to think that I am open to hearing opinions different than my own, but there have certainly been times when I was a little overzealous in defending my viewpoints, which is perhaps where the preacher score comes from.
Even if the quiz is not too accurate, it does give me pause to think about the value of listening to others with opinions different than my own and rethinking my own beliefs, so that I can get closer to that ever-elusive thing known as the truth…
*image from ThoughtCo
Thinking again… like playing devil’s advocate. I do it to others. I may have to start doing it to myself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
that’s a great way to think of it…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Basically, he seems to be advising that we keep an open mind and consider all the possibilities life has to offer. Which I strongly advocate, and stand ready and willing to prove, to anyone who disagrees. And, uh, wait a second . . . Well, I’m sure glad I didn’t take that quiz.
LikeLiked by 2 people
you’ve got to stand up for your convictions with an open mind – it’s quite a dilemma…
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is why I’m a moderate. I don’t handle dilemmas very well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
that’s as good a reason as any…
LikeLiked by 1 person
More than 5 million followers, you are almost there, right?
My son has more followers than me. LOL! Like many more! But anyway….. interesting. I think it is very good to have an open mind, for we can always learn new things. I think we need to have strong convictions as well. Ones that aren’t just going to blow however the wind blows. The secret is not looking down on someone for their convictions, even when they don’t agree with yours.
LikeLiked by 1 person
that seems too reasonable, are you sure you’re not a politician? 🙂
LikeLike
Very interesting concept, and results.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with Adam about the importance of having an open mind…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, this is so interesting. I took the quiz, secretly hoping to be mostly scientist or at least the mysterious “other”. Well, my results are a little more preacher than I’d like. But 0% politician. So I can live with that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was happy to get 0% politician as well!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds like a great philosophy of life. Perhaps it would be helpful if we all could share times where we changed our opinions on a topic when we became more educated or enlightened.
So much of social media, particularly Facebook, seems to be looking for people who share our opinions rather than trying to understand someone else’s point of view.
LikeLiked by 2 people
that’s a great idea about sharing a time when we changed our mind on something…
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Preaching Scientist. Very good but I was hoping to hear more about Other.
LikeLiked by 2 people
yes, I was wondering about the other as well; my guess is that if you chose the “funny” answer for each question, you might get classified as other…
LikeLike
Looks like a interesting book. My quiz results were 30% preacher and 70% scientist. I can love with that.
I liked your brief bio 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
we seem to be two peas in a pod…
I hope my resume didn’t come off as bragging…
LikeLike
After spending a couple of hours reading it, I was quite overwhelmed!
LikeLiked by 1 person
my apologies; I’ve reduced it to: “I did stuff”
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
Here are your scores:
-Preacher: 50%
-Prosecutor: 0%
-Politician: 20%
-Scientist: 30%
-Other: 0%
here I am, and didn’t realize I had a bit of politician or a lot of preacher going on, luckily, there’s a bit of scientist thrown in there to help balance me out, but it sounds like I may need to think again more often. as for your resume, you often have us thinking again -)
LikeLiked by 2 people
it may be that you are one or the other depending on the topic…
hopefully I don’t have you thinking “why am I following this blog?”…
LikeLiked by 1 person
not at all )
LikeLiked by 1 person
phew….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha! You and I are quite similar with our scores, Beth.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Good to know I’m not alone )
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think you left out quite a few published articles and papers from your bio, but you have always been humble about your work. I love the concept of understanding how we think and how to change it in a way that benefits our understanding. Interesting and educational post, Jim!
LikeLiked by 1 person
it is a good idea to think about how we think and behave when our beliefs are brought into question.
and as to the resume, I didn’t want to show up Adam Grant…
LikeLiked by 1 person
That was interesting and fun! Although I was tempted with the default humorous answers… I ended up more a scientist than a preacher and not a politician.
I think being open, aware and questioning our beliefs is key these days!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree that being open, aware, and questioning are critical – and as your blog suggests, it may be helpful if all of us found our middle ground…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Jim!
LikeLiked by 1 person
👍
LikeLike
Great score, Jim. It made for an interesting read too. I think I like the scientist thinking best, but then again …
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m guessng we all have a little bit of each style in us. It may depend on which toic we are discussing, since it may be harder to be a scientis with a subject that is near and dear to us, one that we are emotionally attached to…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with you, Jim.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m looking forward to taking the quiz later. This is interesting. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not sure how factual it is, but I enjoy taking these kinds of quizzes…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do, too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
My scores rather surprised me, Jim
Here are your scores:
-Preacher: 50%
-Prosecutor: 10%
-Politician: 0%
-Scientist: 40%
-Other: 0%
LikeLiked by 1 person
As I read his biography, I thought that Adam sounded a real smart arse. But to be fair I followed his line and I thought again. I am now absolutely sure that he’s a smart arse. For fun, though, I did try the quiz, and this is what it gave me:
Preacher: 40%
-Prosecutor: 20%
-Politician: 10%
-Scientist: 30%
-Other: 0%
On what see as the accuracy of that, I have thought again, again, and my final thought on this is: don’t buy books by smart arses who are just out to make a quick buck from you 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
you’ve got a little bit of everything in you! I admire your willingness to reconsider your opinion of Mr. Grant, even though it did not change 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m either well-rounded or indecisive and mixed up! I thought it only fair to give him a chance, but I still think he’s a smartarse 😊
LikeLike
The feedback is good information I’ll try to keep in mind. I’d like to think I’m more of a scientist, but…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I didn’t read any of the words in italics. Was I supposed to?
LikeLiked by 1 person
no, the stuff in italics is just filler; the stuff not in italics is just nonsense…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gotcha.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, I took the quiz but did not get a response. So, not sure where I fit in all this! 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
that’s odd; I guess they want you to think about your choices again 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
That was a fun quiz. Here are my results:
-Preacher: 10%
-Prosecutor: 0%
-Politician: 10%
-Scientist: 70%
-Other: 10%
I can definitely be a bit preachy sometimes but I was a lot worse before university. I think beign a history major really helped me understand the importance of looking at all aspects of an argument before picking a side.
LikeLiked by 1 person
you seem pretty balanced; I wonder what the “Other” category represents. Did you choose any of the silly answers, just for fun?
and I can see how a history major can be valuable for such purposes…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah I picked one of the silly answers cos none of the others sounded right. I’m glad it was kind of balanced!
LikeLiked by 1 person
it is nice to have a balanced approach…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Love this post.
I think fear is a big inhibitor to the kind of open mindedness needed to think again, most especially fear of being wrong.
Am I right?!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree that fear gets in the way of us thinking clearly…
LikeLike
That was a great post! So, you’re the scientist, and I’m not surprised. That’s a good thing. “Creativity is intelligence having fun.” – Einstein.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love that Einstein quote – I don’t think I’ve seen it before…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, it is one of my favorites. #2 is Maya Angelou’s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
what is Maya’s qute?
LikeLiked by 1 person
People will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
ahhhh, yes. another great quote…
LikeLiked by 1 person
My fave. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting summary! Though I am now retired, I still need to push myself to think again . . . again . . . and again (then repeat). Thank goodness I can drop in here and realize that Jim will do the thinking for me . . . higher level blathering skills!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great food for (re)thought in this post!
LikeLiked by 1 person
well played 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person