Joe Ligon, believed to be the oldest and longest-serving juvenile lifer in the United States, has been released from a Pennsylvania prison after spending nearly seven decades behind bars.
And all I can say, it’s about time.
Ligon was incarcerated in February 1953 at the age of 15, given a mandatory life sentence after pleading guilty to charges stemming from a robbery and stabbing spree in Philadelphia with four other teenage boys. The crime left six people wounded and two people dead.
Ligon admitted to stabbing at least one of the eight people stabbed that day, but has maintained he never killed anyone.
“The child that committed those crimes back in 1953 no longer exists. The person that came out of prison in 2021 is 83 years old, has grown, changed, and is no longer a threat,” his lawyer Bradley Bridge said. “He has amply repaid society for the damage and harm that he did. And now, it’s appropriate that he spends the last years of his life in freedom.”
There has been a good deal of research that the brain of a juvenile is not fully developed, and as a result the juvenile shouldn’t be treated as an adult when it comes to sentencing. If you are interested, here is some background reading.
In 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court had decided that Miller v. Alabama, a 2012 case in which mandatory juvenile life sentences without the prospect of parole were deemed unlawful, should be applied retroactively. The decision effectively resentenced Ligon to 35 years to life, and made him eligible for parole since he had been in prison for over 60 years.
However, Ligon wanted total freedom, he did not want to be subject to parole.
That was consistent with a decision he made back in the 1970s, when Ligon and his accomplices were granted the option of clemency from Pennsylvania’s governor. While two of the men chose to accept the offer, clemency meant being on parole, Ligon rejected the offer. Ligon did not want to be subject to supervision the rest of his life.
Bridge, who has represented Ligon for 15 years now, ultimately argued that a mandatory life sentence for a crime Ligon committed as a juvenile was unconstitutional. After a failed hearing at the Pennsylvania intermediate appellate court, Bridge managed to bring the case to the federal court and won the issue in November 2020, which ultimately granted Ligon freedom under his own terms in 2021.
He is now a free man, and trying to adapt to such a life. Such a transition can be overwhelming, but fortunately there are people who help with such transitions. And Ligon eventually hopes to be one of those who helps others facing such transitions.
I can’t imagine what it must be like to spend 68 years in jail. The mental resolve necessary to survive so long has to extraordinarily difficult. As such, I think Ligon will eventually adapt and thrive in his new life as a free man.
Asked what it was like to be back in the world a day and a half after his release, Ligon had this to say:
“Beautiful,” he said. “Beautiful.”
🤔 I do not think that someone who is fifteen years of age should spend sixty-eight of their years in prison.
Now, do not get me wrong, Jim. I am in no way hinting that they should not serve their sentence. They should be given one that is reduced.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree that if found guilty, juveniles should serve some time. But life without parole is not reasonable, it is cruel and unusual. Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Renard..
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂 You are welcome, Jim.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sentencing in this country seems nuts to me. Someone might get sentenced to 10 years, for a crime where someone else might get only 1 or 2 years. But what’s worse to me is the way prisons are run. They often don’t provide the help a person may need to succeed after being released. And so they get out, and find they can’t survive without committing crimes. Once someone gets caught in the revolving door cycle of incarceration, it can be hard to escape.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Brad and I were talking just last night about what you said with people going right back into prison, because of not being able survive on the outside.the justice and prison sentence definitely needs help!
LikeLiked by 2 people
The prison system seems designed to punish, rather than rehabilitate. Why they call them “Correctional Centers,” I don’t know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very good point!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree. We need to make prison an opportunity for people to better themselves…
LikeLike
Yes, tbere will always have the people that don’t want to better themselves but everyone should have the opportunity
LikeLiked by 1 person
quite true, but we need to make an effort to rehab people, especially juveniles…
LikeLike
Agree!
LikeLiked by 1 person
our criminal justice system is deeply flawed and biased. You point out a couple of the problems.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Great post Jim. I saw this earlier today and was amazed that Ligon held out until they met his conditions. Glad he is finally free. Just another example of biased sentencing in the biased US criminal justice system.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do admire his commitment to wanting to be completely free. and there’s no doubt that our criminal justice system is biased in many ways. Race, wealth, connections, …
LikeLike
I’m reminded of one of my favorite movies, The Shawshank Redemption. When Brooks Hatlen (played by James Whitmore) is finally released from prison at age 73, he commits suicide because he cannot adjust to life on the outside.
LikeLiked by 2 people
My husband and I saw that. It is a powerful movie!
LikeLiked by 2 people
one of the best…
LikeLiked by 1 person
great point, Pete. That was such a sad part of that great movie. Our criminal justice system does not get people ready for life after prison, so it’s no surprise that many people end up in jail again…
LikeLiked by 2 people
I believe the punishment should fit the crime…I also believe that a 15-year-old boy particularly way back then did not have a chance given his colour…That sentence was way too long at that age 15/20 years should have been ample it is an example of a legal system which is not fit for purpose and hasn’t been for many a year…
LikeLiked by 2 people
well said, Carol, and I couldn’t agree more…
LikeLiked by 1 person
no
LikeLiked by 1 person
you get right to the point…
LikeLiked by 1 person
To sentence a young person to life in prison is an indicator that rehabilitation was not a consideration of the sentencing. To be honest, I find it somewhat amazing that he retained any desire to rejoin a society that had treated him so unfairly. I hope that in the years he has left he can find solace in helping others who continue to suffer at the hands of injustice and inequality.
LikeLiked by 2 people
our prison system isn’t really built around rehab, and I am also amazed about how strong his desire was to be a free man. I hope he finds peace and justice in his new life.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think the answer is… it depends.
At 15 a good argument is there age, but it depends on the crime, circumstances, and the victims.
There was a case in the uk, where two teenage boys killed a child called Jamie Bulger. They did a number of horrific things to him, did their time and have now been released under new identities. In that case I could understand some form of life long punishment, maybe not all jail time though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree their needs to be some sort of punishment if you were found guilty. But I don’t think it should not be a one size fits all approach, particularly for juveniles
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is sad that so many ruin their own lives as well as those of others. I think families need more support. We often know which ones are at risk. It’s difficult to break the cycle.
LikeLiked by 1 person
well said, Norah. it is difficult to break the cycle, particularly when someone is born into a challenging situation, and if they go to jail, there is often little rehab offered.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep. Too sad.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do believe juveniles need to be held accountable but as a juvenile not as an adult.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree, a juvenile is not a little adult, and they should not be treated as one…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t think the sentence that he has served is fair in relation to his age at the time of the crimes he committed, and share your hope that he can adjust to life and make a contribution. It will be a huge adjustment, though: the world has changed substantially whilst he has been incarcerated. I guess we can only be thankful that the death penalty wasn’t given to him.
LikeLiked by 2 people
well said, Clive. And I am also glad he was not up for the death penalty, something I strongly oppose…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Likewise. It has long since been abandoned here, apart from a very few offences, I think. It’s barbaric.
LikeLiked by 1 person
that’s the right word to describe it…
LikeLiked by 1 person
A quick PS – I just looked it up, and it was finally abolished for all offences here in 1998. I’m always on top of the news 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unfortunately, we’ve still got it here…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know, as was evidenced by the number of executions in the final days of the previous presidency…
LikeLiked by 1 person
as you noted, barbaric…
LikeLiked by 1 person
In keeping with much of that administration’s policies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
quite true…
LikeLiked by 1 person
So sad! You are right, I can’t imagine being in prison for 68 years!! Robbing and stabbing someone is truly wrong but did it deserve 68 years?? No way!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree. We need some common sense in our criminal justice system…
LikeLike
Yes, common sense is sorely lacking!
LikeLiked by 1 person
in many walks of life
LikeLike
Very true!
LikeLike
Unimaginable! It reminds me of a Canadian case of another 15 year old, Steven Truscott who was sentenced to death in 1959 for the rape and murder of classmate Lynne Harper. He was scheduled to be hanged; however, the federal cabinet reprieved him and he was sentenced to life in prison and released on parole in 1969. Five decades later, in 2007, his conviction was overturned on the basis that key forensic evidence was weaker than had been portrayed at trial.
LikeLiked by 1 person
it is always heart breaking to read about those stories where a person was wrongly convicted and they end up spending decades in jail…
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is so sad. I have always found it barbaric that prisoners can spend years on death row and still be executed. Sometimes we might think a life sentence is not long enough when a prisoner is let out after 12 years! But this sentence is beyond imagining. I hope we hear that he is finding some peace.
LikeLiked by 1 person
to me it speaks to his strength of character to stick by his desire to be completely free; I also hope that he finds peace in the outside world…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am a believer in fairness, Jim, and with the limited knowledge I have of the USA justice system, it does feel as if this man had a very harsh sentence compared to may others who commit crimes that are just as bad and destructive. Personally, I think pedophiles are the worst criminals in the world and should get the death sentence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree that it did seem like a tough sentence, especially for a juvenile. I also agree that pedophiles are among the worst, but I don’t believe in the death sentence for anyone.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve been listening to a podcast about similar cases so I’m sure he will feature soon. It’s an abuse of power for sure to sentence children to life terms without trying to rehabilitate them and understand why they committed the crime.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree; the people in charge of our prisons don’t do enough to try and rehab those in jail.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a disgusting punishment. Imagine the culture shock!
LikeLiked by 1 person
disgusting is a good word. It is going to be a big adjustment…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope so!
LikeLiked by 1 person